Skip to main content
IFR LOFT Scenario

LOFT: London Heathrow to Zurich

Route: EGLL → LSZH

Complex Heathrow SID with multiple constraints, European procedure differences, and Alpine terrain approach.

View FAA WINGS activity on FAASafety.gov →

Scenario Overview

European transport-category flight from London Heathrow to Zurich combining the most complex departure environment in Europe with an Alpine terrain approach. Heathrow SIDs are loaded with speed and altitude restrictions that test FMS programming and compliance. The Zurich approach brings Alpine terrain awareness into every decision. This scenario is designed for FAA AATD-approved Vision Jet simulator training with the G3000 integrated flight deck at Grand Central, or on the G1000 NXi AATD with King Air B200 configuration.

FAA WINGS Credit
Master 99551 cr

Complete this LOFT with one of our CFIIs to earn WINGS credit toward your pilot proficiency. Learn more at FAASafety.gov

SIDILSComplex DeparturesEuropean ProceduresAlpine TerrainICAO

Route & Flight Plan

EGLL MAXIT UL9 KONAN UL607 VEBIT LSZH
AltitudeFL370
Distance476 nm
ETE1:22

Airport Information

Departure
EGLL
London Heathrow Airport
London, United Kingdom
Elevation: 83 ft MSL
Runways
RWYLengthSurface
9L/27R12,802 ftasphalt
9R/27L12,008 ftasphalt
Frequencies
ATIS113.75
CLR121.975
GND121.7
TWR118.5
APP119.725
DEP118.825
Approaches
ILS RWY 9L, ILS RWY 9R, ILS RWY 27L, ILS RWY 27R
Destination
LSZH
Zurich Airport
Zurich, Switzerland
Elevation: 1,416 ft MSL
Runways
RWYLengthSurface
14/3210,827 ftconcrete
16/3412,139 ftconcrete
10/288,202 ftasphalt
Frequencies
ATIS128.525
CLR121.675
GND121.9
TWR118.1
APP118.0
DEP125.95
Approaches
ILS RWY 14, ILS RWY 16, ILS RWY 28, ILS RWY 34, RNAV (GPS) RWY 14, RNAV (GPS) RWY 28

Weather Scenario

A typical autumn pattern across northern Europe. London sits under a persistent stratus deck with visibility limited to 4km in mist — standard Heathrow IFR departure weather. Conditions improve across the English Channel and into France. Switzerland has a different weather system: a weak warm front is bringing moisture from the southwest against the Alps, creating broken layers and light rain developing after 1000Z. The LSZH TAF shows the 0800-0930Z arrival window as MVFR with a trend toward deterioration. The Alpine terrain means you cannot descend through weather with the same comfort margin as flat terrain.

Departure 08:00L (0800Z)EGLLIFR
EGLL 140800Z 25012KT 4000 BR BKN008 OVC015 06/05 Q1022 RMK GRN
Low ceiling departure — broken at 800, overcast at 1,500, mist reducing visibility to 4km
Arrival 10:30L (0930Z)LSZHMVFR
LSZH 140930Z 24010G18KT 6000 SCT020 BKN035 OVC060 04/01 Q1018 NOSIG
Alpine overcast, ceiling 2,000 scattered, 3,500 broken, moderate west wind

Terminal Aerodrome Forecasts

DepartureEGLL
TAF EGLL 140500Z 1406/1506 25010KT 5000 BR BKN010 OVC018 FM140800 25012KT 4000 BR BKN008 OVC015 TEMPO 0809/0812 3000 BR OVC006 FM141200 26014KT 6000 SCT015 BKN025 FM141600 27012KT 9999 SCT025 BKN040 FM150000 25008KT 9999 SCT030
En Route (Paris)LFPG
TAF LFPG 140500Z 1406/1506 24008KT 9999 SCT030 BKN050 FM140800 25010KT 8000 SCT025 BKN045 FM141200 26012KT 6000 SCT020 BKN040 FM141600 27010KT 9999 SCT025 BKN050 FM150000 25008KT 9999 SCT030
ArrivalLSZH
TAF LSZH 140500Z 1406/1506 24008KT 9999 SCT025 BKN050 FM140800 24010G16KT 6000 SCT020 BKN035 OVC060 FM141000 24012G20KT 5000 -RA SCT015 BKN030 OVC050 TEMPO 1010/1014 3000 RA BKN012 FM141400 24010KT 8000 SCT020 BKN040 FM150000 22008KT 9999 SCT025 BKN050

Lesson Profile

Scenario timeline with phases, altitudes, and key events
PhaseTimeAltitudeEvents
Briefing & Setup0:00-0:20GroundBrief Heathrow SID (complex — multiple speed and altitude restrictions within first 10nm). Program and verify every SID constraint in FMS. Brief European procedures: transition altitude (varies by country), QNH vs QFE, ICAO communication differences. Brief ILS RWY 14 at Zurich with Alpine terrain chart.
Departure0:20-0:3583-FL370Depart EGLL RWY 27R. Execute SID with precise speed and altitude compliance — Heathrow SIDs have constraints at 1nm, 3nm, 5nm, and 8nm from the runway. Immediate noise abatement turn. Contact London Control. Fast frequency changes through congested London airspace.
Cruise0:35-0:55FL370Cruise across the English Channel into French airspace. Transition altitude changes by country (UK: 6,000ft, France: varies, Switzerland: 7,000ft). Monitor Zurich weather. Brief STAR and ILS 14 approach. Begin descent planning considering Alpine terrain profile.
STAR & Descent0:55-1:15FL370-6,000STAR into Zurich. Descent must account for Alpine terrain — minimum altitudes are higher than domestic US routes. Swiss Approach vectors for ILS 14. Terrain awareness critical: mountains to the south and east exceed 10,000 feet.
Approach & Landing1:15-1:356,000-1,416ILS RWY 14 at Zurich. Approach corridor has terrain considerations on both sides. Break out at 2,000 feet into MVFR conditions. Gusty crosswind component. Land at 1,416 feet elevation.
Debrief1:35-2:00GroundReview: Heathrow SID compliance (every constraint), European procedural differences, transition altitude management, Alpine terrain awareness during approach. Discuss what makes international IFR operations fundamentally different from US domestic.

Post-LOFT Approach Practice

After the LOFT scenario concludes, practice 2 additional approaches for a total of 3 per session. Session is planned for up to 6 approaches — ask your CFII for additional practice.

Approach 2
LSZH
ILS RWY 28
Different runway orientation — different terrain picture from the west, practice Alpine approach from alternate direction
Approach 3
LSZH
ILS RWY 34
North-facing approach — terrain to the south means the go-around is toward high ground; brief missed approach carefully

Training Objectives

Proficiency

  • Execute a complex Heathrow SID with multiple speed and altitude constraints
  • Navigate European airspace with ICAO procedures
  • Fly the ILS RWY 14 at Zurich with Alpine terrain awareness

Progress

  • Program and verify complex SID constraints in the FMS
  • Apply European ATC procedural differences (transition altitude, metric)
  • Manage terrain awareness during descent into an Alpine airport

Single-Pilot CRM

  • Maintain professional pace in Heathrow's rapid-fire ATC environment
  • Brief Alpine terrain-critical approach thoroughly
  • Apply conservative decision-making with terrain in all quadrants

Prepare for Your Session

What makes Heathrow SIDs among the most complex in the world?
Heathrow handles 1,300+ movements per day on two runways. SIDs have multiple speed and altitude constraints within the first 10nm to separate from other London airports (Gatwick, Stansted, Luton, City). Noise abatement procedures add mandatory turns and speed limits. The SID constraints must be programmed exactly in the FMS — a single wrong altitude or speed bugs the entire departure. ATC clears you on the SID and expects compliance without further instructions until handoff.
How does transition altitude differ in European operations?
Unlike the US standard 18,000 feet, European transition altitudes vary by country: UK is 6,000 feet, France varies by location, Switzerland is 7,000 feet. Below transition altitude, use the local QNH altimeter setting. Above the transition level, use standard pressure (1013.25 hPa). The transition layer between them is where you change altimeter settings. On this flight, you change altimeter settings multiple times as you cross country boundaries.
What Alpine terrain considerations affect the ILS RWY 14 approach at Zurich?
Zurich sits on the Swiss Plateau between the Alps to the south and the Jura Mountains to the northwest. The ILS RWY 14 approach corridor passes between terrain features. The missed approach procedure must clear terrain to the south — this means a go-around is not a simple "climb straight ahead" but requires terrain-aware routing. Mountains within 30nm of Zurich exceed 10,000 feet. The minimum sector altitudes around Zurich are significantly higher than the approach altitude.
What procedural differences should a US-trained pilot expect in European airspace?
Key differences: (1) Altimetry uses QNH (hectopascals) not inches of mercury, and transition altitudes vary by country. (2) Speed is in knots but altitude may be referenced in meters in some countries. (3) ICAO phraseology differences — "flight level" usage, "descend to" vs "descend and maintain." (4) ATC communication style is more procedural and less conversational than US controllers. (5) RNAV/RNP approaches are more common than VOR approaches. (6) Noise abatement procedures are strictly enforced with significant financial penalties.
Instructor Notes
This scenario has two distinct challenges: the Heathrow departure and the Alpine approach. Do not let the student rush through the SID briefing — if they cannot explain every constraint before pushing the throttles, they are not ready. Score SID compliance strictly: altitude within 100 feet, speed within 10 knots at every constraint. The transition altitude changes are an easy teaching point that most US pilots have never practiced. The Zurich approach is the capstone: Alpine terrain makes every decision higher-stakes. The go-around briefing must include specific terrain-avoidance routing.